Question Description
Create a list of interview questions (at least 8 but no more than 10) addressing your project topic. Please be sure the questions are open-ended and encourage discussion.
As one of your questions, show the expert your final project and seek/his her feedback on what you did well and what you could do to enhance it.
Type up the summary of what you learned during the interview. Be sure to include:
1) Information about the interviewee: describe his/her position and why you feel he/she was a credible resource to recruit for the interview. (Should be written in paragraph(s) form.)
2) The interview questions that you composed*
3) The responses you received*
4) Finally, conclude with what you gained by participating in this activity. (Should be written in paragraph(s) form.)
*Part 2 and 3 should be in the form of a transcript (
state the
question in bold text
and the response in unbolded text.)
As such, the assignment should include the following sections:
(1) Title page, (2) Description of Interviewee, (3) Transcript of Interview, (4) Personal Analysis.
GRADING:Be sure to view the rubric to see the specifics for how you will be assessed for this assignment.
EDUC 696 Interview Assignment
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:
For your project, you had to use resources that were already published. Now that your
project is complete and submitted, you can do further research on this topic.
Set up a meeting to interview a classroom teacher, special education teacher, resource
teacher, specialist, guidance counselor, principal, central office administrator, or other
professional personnel that you feel would be an expert on the topic of your project. It is
preferred that the interview be conducted in person, but by phone will work if necessary
Create a list of interview questions (at least 8 but no more than 10) addressing your
project topic. Please be sure the questions are open-ended and encourage discussion.
As one of your questions, show the expert your final project and seek/his her feedback
on what you did well and what you could do to enhance it.
Type up the summary of what you learned during the interview. Be sure to include:
1) Information about the interviewee: describe his/her position and why you feel
he/she was a credible resource to recruit for the interview. (Should be written in
paragraph(s) form.)
2) The interview questions that you composed*
3) The responses you received*
4) Finally, conclude with what you gained by participating in this activity. (Should
be written in paragraph(s) form.)
*Part 2 and 3 should be in the form of a transcript (state the question in bold text
and the response in unbolded text.)
As such, the assignment should include the following sections: (1) Title page, (2)
Description of Interviewee, (3) Transcript of Interview, (4) Personal Analysis.
GRADING: Be sure to view the rubric to see the specifics for how you will be assessed
for this assignment.
Submit the assignment to the link provided in Blackboard.
EXPERT EDUCATOR GRADING RUBRIC
Criteria
Content 70%
Biographical
Information about
the Expert /
Interviewee
(10 pts)
Number of Interview
Questions
(10 pts)
Type of Questions
(10 pts)
Relevance of
Questions
(10 pts)
Responses
(10 pts)
Levels of Achievement
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
A 6 to 7 sentence paragraph is
provided that describes the
interviewee, his or her position,
and why he/she is a credible
resource to recruit for the
interview.
A 4 to 5 sentence paragraph is
provided that describes the
interviewee, his or her position,
and why he/she is a credible
resource to recruit for the
interview.
Not enough biographical
information is provided to
highlight why the educator is a
credible resource to recruit for the
interview.
No biographical
information about the
interviewee is provided.
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
8 to 10 questions are
composed.
6-7 questions are composed.
1-5 questions are composed.
No questions were
composed.
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
The questions are creative and
open ended and lead to good
discussion.
The questions are open ended.
Most of the questions are
convergent and do not promote
discussion.
All questions were
convergent.
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
All questions are clearly related
to the project topic.
Most all questions are clearly
related to the project topic.
Few questions are relevant to the
project topic.
No questions are relevant
to the project topic.
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
All responses clearly represent
the words of the interviewee.
Responses appear to represent
the words of the interviewee.
Few responses appear to
represent the words of the
interviewee.
Responses do not clearly
represent the words of the
interviewee.
Project Question and
Response
(10 pts)
Personal Analysis
(10 pts)
Structure 30%
Format
(10 pts)
Mechanical errors in
grammar or
punctuation or
spelling or
capitalization
(10 pts)
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
A question and response
addressed the project. The
interviewee’s response
included the positive aspects of
the project AND what could be
done to enhance the project.
A question and response
addressed the project. The
interviewee’s response included
the positive aspects of the
project OR what could be done
to enhance the project.
A question and response
addressed the project. More
clarity should be provided on how
the project could be enhanced.
No question was provided
about the project.
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
The candidate provided rich
description (a complete
paragraph or more) about what
he/she learned as a result of
conducting the interview.
The candidate provided minimal
but adequate description about
what he/she learned as a result
of conducting the interview.
The candidate did not provide
enough detail to show evidence
that he/she learned any new
information as a result of
conducting the interview.
No analysis was provided.
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
The directions were followed:
the questions and responses
were in the form of a transcript
with the question in bold text
and the responses in plan,
“unbolded” text.
The questions and responses
were in the form of a transcript.
The questions and responses were
not in the form of a transcript (but
they were comprehendible).
The questions and
responses were not in the
form of a transcript (and
they were not
comprehendible).
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
The assignment exhibits no
mechanical errors.
The assignment exhibits 2 or 3
mechanical errors.
The assignment exhibits 4 to 7
mechanical errors.
8 or more mechanical
errors evident.
Sentence Structure in
the Description of the
Interviewee and the
Personal Analysis.
(10 pts)
Total
10 points
9 points
1 to 8 points
0 points
Sentence structure uses a
variation of simple, compound,
complex, and compound
complex. Narrative is flowing
and competent and represents
the writing of a graduate
student.
Sentence structure mostly uses
a variation of simple,
compound, complex, and
compound complex. Narrative
is competent and represents the
writing of a graduate student.
Sentence structure is overly
simple. Concepts and ideas in the
narrative are unclear. The writing
rambles and does not represent
the writing of a graduate student.
The narrative is not
comprehendible.
100
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
