Lesson 5 Discussion (250 Words)
SEE THE ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS
Lesson 5 Assignment (2 Pages)
SEE THE ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS
Reading Resources
Cognitive Assessment- https://www.alz.org/professionals/health-systems-clinicians/cognitive-assessment
CSWE Differential Mental Health Assessment- https://www.cswe.org/Centers-Initiatives/CSWE-Gero-Ed-Center/Initiatives/Past-Programs/MAC-Project/Gero-Innovations-Grant/Saint-Louis-University/Mental-Health-Course-Materials.aspx
Mental Status Examination I Definitions- http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/medical/psychmed/1_2004/mental_status_exam.pdf
Lesson 6 Mental Health in Older Adults
Lesson 6 Discussion- (250 words).
SEE THE ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS
Reading Resources
Understanding Depression and Aging: Guidance for Social Workers- https://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/JF18p10.shtml
Older Adults and Mental Health- https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/older-adults-and-mental-health
10 Facts About Mental Health and Aging- http://www.lifeseniorservices.org/seniorline/10_Facts_About_Mental_Health_and_Aging.asp
Discover the Top Symptoms and Risk Factors of Mental Illness in the Elderly- https://www.aplaceformom.com/caregiver-resources/articles/mental-illness
Depression and Older Adults- https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/depression-and-older-adults
Depression and Alzheimer’s- https://hms.harvard.edu/news/depression-alzheimers
The State of Mental Health and Aging in America- https://www.cdc.gov/aging/pdf/mental_health.pdf
Suicide Prevention Resource Center: Older Adults- https://www.sprc.org/populations/older-adults#:~:text=Suicide%20is%20an%20important%20problem,any%20group%20in%20the%20country.&text=Suicide%20attempts%20by%20older%20adults,death%20than%20among%20younger%20persons
Anxiety and Older Adults: Overcoming Worry and Fear- https://www.aagponline.org/index.php?src=gendocs&ref=anxiety
SWK205- MODULE 3 ASSIGNMENT
TOPIC: Lesson 5 Assessing Older Adults
Lesson 5 Discussion
Please review the readings and consider the following in your discussion response:
· What techniques would you use to engage an older adult during your first meeting?
· What areas do you need to consider relating to the Mental Status Exam when meeting with an older adult during the assessment process?
· What types of questions would you want to ask during the assessment?
· What are some ways you could assess for cognitive impairment when meeting with an older adult during the assessment process?
· What assessment tools did you learn about that could be helpful as a part of the assessment process?
Lesson 5 Assignment
Teresa is a 77-year-old, Hispanic female who has been referred by her doctor to the Orange Crest Senior Center. You are meeting with Teresa for an intake case management session. Teresa’s presenting problems including isolation and difficulty obtaining regular food/basic needs due to her limited ability to walk and drive. Teresa also mentioned it is hard for her to move around her home because of all her personal belongings and she has difficulty throwing anything away. Teresa also discussed concerns about her limited income though she thought her husband left a significant amount of money when he died. Teresa explained that her children have control of the finances and although they pay her bills, they often tell her when she asks for something, that the money has been spent for the month.
Using this vignette and the assessment form, please find a friend, family member, or colleague who can role-play this scenario with you. Please consider what you have learned about how to engage a client and complete an assessment. As the Social Worker, you will want to ask the client questions and not provide them the assessment form to complete on their own. After you have completed the assessment, please ask your role-play partner for feedback about their experience (your strengths and areas for growth). Please consider the following questions for your paper:
· What techniques did you use to engage the client?
· What assessment strategies did you use in your roleplay (what specific questions did you ask)?
· What feedback did your partner provide about this experience (your strengths and areas for growth?
For this assignment, you will submit the completed assessment form, mental status exam form, and a one-page paper with your responses to the above questions.
The paper should be approximately 1-2 pages and include high-quality writing. Please include a title page and double-check all spelling and grammar before submitting. Also, please make sure to cite all relevant information and include references as appropriate.
Please use one of the ATTACHED assessment forms. You can type in the Word document or print out the PDF form and write your responses.
Reading Resources
Cognitive Assessment- https://www.alz.org/professionals/health-systems-clinicians/cognitive-assessment
CSWE Differential Mental Health Assessment- https://www.cswe.org/Centers-Initiatives/CSWE-Gero-Ed-Center/Initiatives/Past-Programs/MAC-Project/Gero-Innovations-Grant/Saint-Louis-University/Mental-Health-Course-Materials.aspx
Mental Status Examination I Definitions-
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/medical/psychmed/1_2004/mental_status_exam.pdf
Lesson 6 Mental Health in Older Adults
Lesson 6 Discussion
Please review the readings and consider the following in your discussion response:
• What are your thoughts after reviewing the readings?
• Why is it important that a Social Worker be aware of the mental health needs of older adults?
• What do you need to consider regarding suicide prevention and assessment in older adults?
• As a Social Worker, what questions would you want to ask an older adult client you are working with to determine if there are any mental health concerns?
To receive full credit, you will need to fully answer the discussion questions and provide two substantial responses to your classmate’s posts. These responses should also be substantial and provide thoughtful reflection.
The discussion post should be a minimum of 250 words or one page.
Reading Resources
Understanding Depression and Aging: Guidance for Social Workers-
https://www.socialworktoday.com/archive/JF18p10.shtml
Older Adults and Mental Health- https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/older-adults-and-mental-health
10 Facts About Mental Health and Aging- http://www.lifeseniorservices.org/seniorline/10_Facts_About_Mental_Health_and_Aging.asp
Discover the Top Symptoms and Risk Factors of Mental Illness in the Elderly- https://www.aplaceformom.com/caregiver-resources/articles/mental-illness
Depression and Older Adults- https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/depression-and-older-adults
Depression and Alzheimer’s- https://hms.harvard.edu/news/depression-alzheimers
The State of Mental Health and Aging in America-
https://www.cdc.gov/aging/pdf/mental_health.pdf
Suicide Prevention Resource Center: Older Adults- https://www.sprc.org/populations/older-adults#:~:text=Suicide%20is%20an%20important%20problem,any%20group%20in%20the%20country.&text=Suicide%20attempts%20by%20older%20adults,death%20than%20among%20younger%20persons
Anxiety and Older Adults: Overcoming Worry and Fear- https://www.aagponline.org/index.php?src=gendocs&ref=anxiety
CLIENT ID # Intake Date
Brief Intake – Assessment
Referral Date Referred by:
(Date Referred to Case Management Program)
Last Name First Name M.I.
Does client prefer to be referred to by any other name?
Street/Apt. Number
City
State _______ ZIP
County
Phone ( )
Cell phone ( )
Emergency Contact Number ( ) Name/Relationship
Is Emergency Contact aware of client’s HIV status? Yes No
Client can be contacted (check all that apply)
At Home By Mail By Phone
Is discretion required?
PRESENTING PROBLEM/IMMEDIATE CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICE NEEDS:
NON-MEDICAL SERVICE PROVIDERS:
(i.e. Advocacy, Intensive Case Management, Housing, Food, Support Groups)
Agency |
Contact Person |
Phone |
Service |
Are case management services provided through another agency? Yes No
Case Management Standards Brief Intake/Assessment 3.9.06
Date of Birth: Age:
GENDER: Female Male
Transgender-ID as Female Transgender-ID as Male
Ethnicity: Hispanic? Yes, specify: No
Race: Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White American Indian or Alaska Native Other:
Relationship Status: Single Single-living w/partner Married Divorced
Separated Widowed
Person describes self as: Heterosexual Homosexual Bisexual Transgender
Primary language spoken:
English: Read? Yes No Write? Yes No
Other Language: Read? Yes No Write? Yes No
Does the client have difficulty understanding English? Yes No
Does the client have difficulty using English to navigate the health and social service systems? Yes No
Citizenship/Immigration Status:
Is the client an undocumented U.S. resident? Yes No
Does the client have pending immigration issues? Yes No
Living Situation:
On street Shelter Transitional Group Home Drug Treatment Residence
SRO (specify) 28 Day Permanent
Rental Own Home
Other
Living Arrangement:
Relations/Friends Alone
Temporary Permanent
Does the client have temporary, unsafe, and/or inadequate housing? Yes No
10
HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION
Number of people in household (including client):
Name |
Relationship |
HIV Status (+ , – or unknown |
Age |
Aware of Client’s HIV+ Status? (Y/N/NA) |
Name |
Relationship |
DOB |
Sex |
School Grade |
Aware of Client’s HIV+ Status? (Y/N) |
Aware Of Own HIV+ Status? (Y/N/NA) |
|
/ / |
M |
F |
|||||
/ / |
M |
F |
|||||
/ / |
M |
F |
|||||
/ / |
M |
F |
|||||
/ / |
M |
F |
LIVING OUTSIDE OF HOUSEHOLD (partners, children, other close supports)
Name |
Relationship |
HIV Status (+ , – or unknown) |
Age |
Aware of Client’s HIV+ Status (Y/N) |
Whereabouts |
Do household members, children or close supports have needs that impact client’s ability to access or maintain treatment or care? Yes No
Are there disclosure issues that can be assisted by case management? Yes No
Does the client have a functioning support system? Yes No
PRIMARY INSURANCE
Indicate all that apply:
Medicaid: Number with Sequence # ( ) Is there an exception – 35? Yes No
Is there a spend-down? Yes, in the amount of No
Medicaid Managed Care Medicare Private Insurance HMO/Managed Care
ADAP PLUS Self Pay Military Other:
SECONDARY INSURANCE None or Yes, (check below)
Medicaid Managed Care Medicare Private Insurance HMO/Managed Care
ADAP PLUS Self Pay Military Other:
Effective Date of Secondary Insurance:
HASA #
(NYC only)
Does the client need assistance with insurance for medical care? Yes No
MEDICAL
(This section is optional in medical settings where this information is readily accessible to the case manager.)
A. Primary Medical Care
Provider Name:
Address:
City: State: Zip: Main Phone:
Case Manager/Social Worker: Phone:
Primary Physician: Phone:
Recent Hospitalizations:
Last time saw doctor: CD4 Count: Viral load:
B. Other Medical Conditions
C.
Pharmacy
(Specify):
Client restricted to us of a specific pharmacy? Yes No
D.
Medications
(List all taken currently, e.g., HIV, TB, HCV, Psychotropics, etc.):
Does the client have difficulty keeping appointments or problems taking medications? Yes No
Are there debilitating symptoms requiring assistance (i.e., homecare, home delivered meals)? Yes No
TOTAL MONTHLY HOUSEHOLD INCOME SOURCE & BENEFITS
Employment |
|
HIV/AIDS Service Administration |
|
Social Security |
|
Short Term Disability |
|
SSI |
|
Survivor Benefits |
|
SSD |
|
Rent Supplement |
|
Child Support |
|
Veteran’s Assistance |
|
Public Assistance |
|
Pension |
|
Disability Ins. Inc. |
|
Long Term Disability |
|
Alimony |
|
Unemployment Insurance |
|
|
Food Stamps |
|
Total Personal Monthly Income:
Additional monthly income from household members:
Total monthly household income:
Annual household income (for URS) :
(Monthly income x12)
Does the client have a regular source of income? Yes No
Does client have difficulty meeting monthly expenses? Yes No
Is the client linked to income sources they are eligible for? Yes No
Does the client need assistance/advocacy in accessing entitlements? Yes No
MENTAL HEALTH
Is client currently receiving mental health counseling? Yes No
Clinician: Phone: Has client ever received mental health counseling? Yes No
When For how long?
Ever hospitalized for a psychiatric condition? Yes No
Most recent date: Where? Reason:
Does client mental health treatment include medications? Yes No (if yes include on medication list – pg 5, Section F)
Client’s assessment of mental health/emotional support needs:
Comments:
Does client have a need for mental health services? Yes No
Does the client have difficulty keeping mental health appointments? Yes No NA
Does the client have difficulty taking psychotropic medication as prescribed? Yes No NA
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Has the client ever been in an abusive relationship? Yes No – If yes, explain
Does client feel safe in current living arrangement? Yes No – If no, explain:
Does client ever feel that they or a family member/partner would resort to force when interacting? Yes No – If yes, explain:
Does the client have needs related to current or recent domestic violence? Yes No NA
SUBSTANCE USE
Does client have a history of drug/alcohol use? Yes No Is client currently using? Yes No
If Yes, how long? days/weeks/months/years
Drug(s) of choice:
Frequency of use: Is client currently in SU treatment program? Yes No
If Yes, how often? Per day/week/month/year
Program Name:
Contact Person: Phone:
If not in treatment, is client interested in SU treatment, syringe exchange, other supports? Yes No Does client want assistance to quit smoking? Yes No
Is the client experiencing problems as a result of alcohol or drug use? Yes No
Is the client seeking treatment for alcohol or drug use? Yes No
OTHER NEEDS
Does the client need assistance obtaining Nutritious food? Yes No Appropriate clothing? Yes No Transportation? Yes No
Legal services? Yes No
Education/training/employment? Yes No
SUMMARY PAGE
Summarize client status, presenting needs, and assessed needs. Elaborate on any questions in the shaded boxes indicating unmet needs.
CASE DISPOSITION
Client ID#: Client Name:
Case management recommended? Yes No
Model? Supportive CM Comprehensive CM
(Explain recommended model to client)
Case Management accepted? Supportive CM Comprehensive CM Declined
If not case management at agency, where referred?
IMMEDIATE REFERRALS MADE: (include contact name)
Hospital/Clinic: For: Agency: For: Agency: For: Internal: For: Internal: For:
CM Consent form signed? Yes No Given copy of “Client Rights”? Yes No
Intake/Assessment Completed by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Mental Status Exam
© 2013 Therapist Aid LLC Provided by TherapistAid.com
Client Name Date
OBSERVATIONS
Appearance □ Neat □ Disheveled □ Inappropriate □ Bizarre □ Other
Speech □ Normal □ Tangential □ Pressured □ Impoverished □ Other
Eye Contact □ Normal □ Intense □ Avoidant □ Other
Motor Activity □ Normal □ Restless □ Tics □ Slowed □ Other
Affect □ Full □ Constricted □ Flat □ Labile □ Other
Comments:
MOOD
□ Euthymic □ Anxious □ Angry □ Depressed □ Euphoric □ Irritable □ Other
Comments:
COGNITION
Orientation Impairment □ None □ Place □ Object □ Person □ Time
Memory Impairment □ None □ Short-Term □ Long-Term □ Other
Attention □ Normal □ Distracted □ Other
Comments:
PERCEPTION
Hallucinations □ None □ Auditory □ Visual □ Other
Other □ None □ Derealization □ Depersonalization
Comments:
THOUGHTS
Suicidality □ None □ Ideation □ Plan □ Intent □ Self-Harm
Homicidality □ None □ Aggressive □ Intent □ Plan
Delusions □ None □ Grandiose □ Paranoid □ Religious □ Other
Comments:
BEHAVIOR
□ Cooperative □ Guarded □ Hyperactive □ Agitated □ Paranoid
□ Stereotyped □ Aggressive □ Bizarre □ Withdrawn □ Other
Comments:
INSIGHT □ Good □ Fair □ Poor Comments:
JUDGMENT □ Good □ Fair □ Poor Comments:
Jean Galiana &
William A. Haseltine
Solutions to the Most
Pressing Global
Challenges of Aging
Aging
Well
Aging Well
Jean Galiana • William A. Haseltine
Aging Well
Solutions to the Most Pressing Global
Challenges of Aging
ISBN 978-981-13-2163-4 ISBN 978-981-13-2164-1 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2164-1
Library of Congress Control Number: 2018962361
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019. This book is an open access publication.
Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adapta-
tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to
the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if
changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s
Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the
permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or
the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any
errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Cover illustration: Halfpoint
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721,
Singapore
Jean Galiana
Vital Research
Los Angeles, CA, USA
William A. Haseltine
ACCESS Health International
New York, NY, USA
v
This book is a product of ACCESS Health International (www.accessh.
org). ACCESS Health is a think tank, advisory group, and implementa-
tion partner dedicated to assuring that everyone, no matter where they
live and no matter what their age, has access to high-quality affordable
healthcare. ACCESS Health works in low-, middle-, and high-income
countries. In high-income countries, our focus is on care of older adults
and those with dementia. This book identifies and analyzes policies and
practices in the United States that serve as models of excellence in elder
care and optimal aging. We chose the title Aging Well because we believe
that well-being should be the number one focus of all aging care, sup-
ports, and interventions. A companion book Aging with Dignity exam-
ines similar topics in Sweden and several Northern European countries.
Our method was to identify organizations in the United States that
exemplify the best in elder care and optimal aging. We then interviewed
the leaders and champions of those organizations and programs. The full
text of the interviews is available on the ACCESS Health website or at
this link: www.accessh.org/agingwell. Here, we analyze our findings and
present them in the broader context of elder and dementia care and social
inclusion. Our focus areas include long-term care financing, person-
centered care, coordinated primary care, home-based palliative and pri-
mary care, support for those living with dementia and their caregivers,
acute and emergency care in the home and community, the combination
Preface
vi Preface
of health and social care that addresses the social determinants of health,
and housing, social inclusion, purpose, and lifelong learning.
From these interviews we abstract eight key lessons for achieving high-
quality affordable elder care and effective systems that support social
inclusion and purposeful aging. Those lessons are:
• The availability of affordable long-term care insurance is essential to
improve access and sustain the costs of caring for older adults.
• Person-centered care is a lynchpin of high-quality care and well-being
for older adults.
• Support and palliative care in the home and community setting is
essential for making care accessible to older adults that honors their
care and late-life priorities.
• Coordinated primary healthcare improves elder care quality and acces-
sibility and lowers healthcare costs.
• It is imperative that we build systems of support and inclusion for
those with dementia and their caregivers.
• Delivery of acute and hospital-level care in the home and community
is essential to lower healthcare costs and improve access, health out-
comes, and well-being for older adults.
• Social inclusion and the opportunity to live a purposeful life are essen-
tial to the happiness and well-being of older adults.
• Combining health and social care with upstream interventions to treat
the biopsychosocial and environmental needs is the way forward to
sustainable systems of care that improve function, well-being, and
independence.
The book identifies and details global aging challenges and, chapter by
chapter, offers innovative and impactful solutions to those challenges that
our interviewees have designed. It is our genuine hope that providers and
government entities around the globe that are seeking methods to improve
their elder care and social support systems will find ideas, inspiration, and
possibly collaborative opportunities to enhance the well-being of older adults.
Los Angeles, CA Jean Galiana
New York, NY William A. Haseltine
July 2017
vii
We thank all those who contributed their time and thought to help us
understand the issues facing older adults and what can be done to ensure
that all have access to high-quality affordable care and the opportunity to
live productive and active lives.
Claude Thau patiently described the rocky history of the long-term
care insurance industry and why many still do not have long-term care
insurance today.
We learned the true meaning of patient-centered care culture from
Christopher Perna, the former CEO and President of the Eden Alternative.
Rebecca Priest from St. John’s explained how to build an operational
culture around person-centered philosophies.
The leadership of Beatitudes Campus brought the person-centered
concept to a new light with their Comfort Matters™ palliative care for
those living with dementia.
Dr. Allen Power made us think about the possibility of not segregating
those who have dementia from the rest of the community.
They all convinced us that person-centered communication and care is
almost always a better option than the use of antipsychotic medications
to meet the needs of someone living with dementia.
Dr. Allan Teel of Full Circle America, Dr. Diane E. Meier of the Center
to Advance Palliative Care, and Dr. Kristofer Smith of Northwell Health
Acknowledgments
viii Acknowledgments
inspired us with their dedication to enabling aging in place and where
patients receive the right care in the right setting and live with dignity
throughout their life.
Kristofer and Allan have been making house calls for all of their careers
because they know that it improves access to care, costs less, and signifi-
cantly contributes to the well-being of their patients.
Allan connects his patients to local supports and services so that his
patients stay engaged and connected to their neighborhoods.
Diane remains vigilant in her pursuit to make palliative care available
in all care settings.
Drs. Michael Barr and Erin Giovannetti of the National Committee
for Quality Assurance gave us a compelling case for the patient-centered
medical home to improve coordinated efficient primary care.
The Director of the James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Dr. Erik
Langhoff, uses technology to improve access to high-quality care for
veterans.
Dr. Mark Prather and Kevin Riddleberger with DispatchHealth and
Dr. Kristofer Smith with Northwell Health are proof positive that deliv-
ering acute medical care in the home and community improves access
and quality at a fraction of the cost.
Dr. Bruce Leff with Johns Hopkins School of Medicine showed us that
providing hospital-level care in the home to patients who qualify can
reduce care costs and produce higher-quality health outcomes.
Timothy Peck, Garrett Gleeson, and XiaoSong Mu with Call9 are con-
tributing to the well-being of patients living in skilled nursing by provid-
ing technology-enabled emergency care and palliative care around the
clock.
Dr. Mary Mittelman with the NYU Caregiver Intervention has proven
the value of supporting the informal caregiver for someone living with
dementia.
Jed Levine and Elizabeth Santiago tirelessly support those in the early
stages of dementia and their caregivers with their vigorous programs at
CaringKind.
Davina Porock impressed upon us the importance of the built envi-
ronment of the hospital for those living with dementia.
ix Acknowledgments
Karen Love and Jackie and Lon Pinkowitz remind us of the vital
importance of fighting the stigma of dementia with thoughtful
community conversations. They also noted the importance of involving
those with dementia in policy and program design.
Brian LeBlanc shared his journey of living for dementia and his stories
about his impactful advocacy efforts.
June Simmons with the Partners in Care Foundation impressed upon
us the need to combine social care and healthcare and address social
determinants of health through evidence-based prevention programs.
Sarah Szanton with CAPABLE proved that it is possible to improve
function in frail older adults by providing home modifications with nurs-
ing and occupational care to support the goals and priorities of
participants.
Joani Blank invited us into her home at the Swan’s Market cohousing
community in Oakland, California. We spent a half-day seeing how
cohousing promotes community inclusion and multigenerational
connections.
Rebecca Priest with St. John’s and the management of Beatitudes
Campus regaled us with stories of resident-run activities that facilitate
productive living and generativity.
Anne Doyle surprised us with the amount of lifelong learning and
intergenerational connections taking place at Lasell Village, a retirement
community on the campus of a college.
Mia Oberlink formerly with the Center for Home Care Policy and
Research impressed the importance of involving older adults in the design
of all initiatives that serve them. Ruth Finkelstein formerly with the
Robert N. Butler Columbia Aging Center and the International Longevity
Centre USA is committed to ensuring that employers who retain and
attract older employees are honored so others will follow suit. Ruth and
Dorian Block are combating the stigma of aging by telling the stories of
older adults who exceeded life expectancy in New York City and are liv-
ing vibrant productive lives.
Lindsay Goldman with Age-Friendly NYC expressed the need for
public and private partnerships to make environments accessible to those
of all ages and abilities. She explained that older adults must be consid-
ered in all areas of city planning and policy making.
x Acknowledgments
Emi Kiyota showed us how multigenerational community hubs con-
tribute to resilience after natural disasters and serve as places of produc-
tive engagement and social inclusion.
Dr. Paul Tang, formerly with the Director of the David Druker Center
for Health Systems Innovation, uses social connections as a form of
health prevention by connecting patients to a timebank where they
exchange tasks and teaching of hobbies and new skills.
Our research was supported by the William A. Haseltine Charitable
Foundation Trust.
xi
ACCESS Health International is an independent, nonprofit think tank
that works for the provision of high-quality, affordable care for all, includ-
ing the chronically ill. Our method is to identify, analyze, and document
best practices in helping people and to consult with public and private
providers to help implement new and better cost-effective ways to offer
care. We also encourage entrepreneurs to create new businesses to serve
the needs of this rapidly expanding population. Our goal is to inspire and
guide healthcare professionals and legislative leaders in all countries to
improve care for their own people.
About ACCESS Health International
xiii
1 Demographics 1
2 Healthcare in the United States 7
3 Long-Term Care Financing 19
4 Person-Centered Long-Term Care 29
5 Home-Based Palliative Care and Aging in Place and
Community 59
6 Coordinated Primary Care 79
7 Emergency Medicine and Hospital Care in the Home and
Community 91
8 Support for Those Living with Dementia and Their
Caregivers 117
Contents
xiv Contents
9 Merging Health and Social Services 139
10 Purpose and Social Inclusion 159
11 Eight Lessons for Social Inclusion and High-Quality
Sustainable Elder Care 203
Index 217
xv
William A. Haseltine, PhD He is the Chair and President of ACCESS Health
International. He was a professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard
School of Public Health from 1976 to 1993, where he was founder and the chair
of two academic research departments, the Division of Biochemical Pharmacology
and the Division of Human Retrovirology. He is well known for his pioneering
work on cancer, HIV/AIDS, and genomics. He has authored more than 200
manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals and is the author of several books, includ-
ing Aging with Dignity: Innovation and Challenge in Sweden and Affordable
Excellence: The Singapore Healthcare Story.
Jean Galiana, MASM, RCFE In her role at ACCESS Health International,
Jean Galiana successfully promoted key messages about elder care and optimal
aging to engage policy makers, healthcare providers, the general public, and
stakeholders. She managed qualitative research projects to discover, document,
and advocate for best practices in aging in the United States. Currently Jean works
in communications and survey research for Vital Research in Los Angeles,
CA. She obtained her undergraduate degree in business from Lehman College
and holds a master’s degree in aging services management from the University of
Southern California Leonard Davis School of Gerontology.
About the Authors
xvii
Fig. 1.1 Rectangularization of the global aging pyramid from 1970 to
2060 2
Fig. 1.2 Global distribution of population 65 and over in 2015 and
2050. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013, 2014a, 2014b;
International Data Base, U.S. population estimates, and U.S.
population projections 3
Fig. 1.3 Potential support ratios by region, 2015, 2030, and 2050.
Source: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs 4
Fig. 3.1 Growth in demand for LTSS. Source: Bipartisan Policy Center 20
Fig. 4.1 Green House at Penfield 36
Fig. 4.2 Penfield Green House Great Room 36
Fig. 4.3 Mr. H’s binder 40
Fig. 4.4 St. John’s to traditional skilled nursing regional comparison 42
Fig. 5.1 Palliative care gap 70
Fig. 8.1 CaringKind entrance welcome 121
Fig. 8.2 MedicAlert® bracelet and necklace 128
Fig. 9.1 Results of HomeMeds PLUS Pilot Program. Source: Partners
in Care Foundation 147
Fig. 10.1 AdvantAge Initiative. Age-friendly Measures 176
List of Figures
1© The Author(s) 2019
J. Galiana, W. A. Haseltine, Aging Well,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2164-1_1
1
Demographics
The commitment of ACCESS Health International to elder care and
optimal aging is fueled by the global change in demographics. The popu-
lation over 60 is expected to double to 22 percent, reaching 2.1 billion
from 2000 to 2050.1 The demographic shift is attributed to increased life
span, lower mortality rates, declining immigration rates, and lower fertil-
ity rates. Figure 1.1 is an example of the rectangularization process from
1970 to 2060.
The 100-year shift that began in 1950 is only 17 years past its mid-
point.2 By 2060, the pyramid will resemble a dome shape. Some predict
that it will morph into the shape of a rectangle3 because, in many coun-
tries, the oldest old (85+) population is growing the fastest.4 The global
population of those 85–99 is projected to increase by 151 percent from
2005 to 2050, while the population of those 100+ is expected to increase
by more than 400 percent5 (Table 1.1).
The demographic shift is occurring at varying rates throughout the
world (Fig. 1.2). The United Nations reported that, in 2015, almost 25
percent of the world’s population 60 and over lived in China and that
only four other countries account for another 25 percent including the
2
United States, Japan, India, and the Russian Federation.6 The projected
growth rate for the over 60 population also varies from country to coun-
try, but is expected to continue to grow globally until 2060.
Potential Support Ratio
One result of the demographic shift is that there will be substantially
more older people who need care and fewer younger people to provide
the care. This care conundrum is reflected in the potential support ratio—
the number of workers (age 15–65) to the number of retirees (65+). The
potential support ratio has been declining substantially from 2000 to
2050 (Fig. 1.3).
With the shrinking potential support ratio, who will care for the grow-
ing number of older adults? Immigration is one answer, but the overarch-
ing response should be that healthcare and social support systems become
Fig. 1.1 Rectangularization of the global aging pyramid from 1970 to 2060
Table 1.1 Projected global population increase by age group 2005–2050
Age Percent increase (%)
0–64 21
65+ 104
85+ 151
100+ 400
Source: National Institute of Aging
J. Galiana and W. A. Haseltine
3
Fig. 1.2 Global distribution of population 65 and over in 2015 and 2050. Source:
U.S. Census Bureau, 2013, 2014a, 2014b; International Data Base, U.S. population
estimates, and U.S. population projections
Demographics
4
more efficient to meet the significant needs of this cohort. Informal
caregivers make invaluable contributions, but they cannot meet the com-
plex care needs of the growing older population. This care gap is further
magnified when considering the rates of comorbidity and cognitive and
functional limitations of the older population.
We will begin with some facts about healthcare in the United States
and then describe solutions to the challenges we have laid out.
Notes
1. World Health Organization (2015). Global strategy and action plan.
2. Bongaarts, J. (2009). Human population growth and the demographic
transition. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London,
364(1532), 2895–2990.
3. (2014). The next America. America’s morphing age pyramid. Pew
Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/next-america/age-pyramid/.
Accessed March 2016.
Fig. 1.3 Potential support ratios by region, 2015, 2030, and 2050. Source: UN
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
J. Galiana and W. A. Haseltine
5
4. National Institute on Aging. Why population aging matters: A global per-
spective. Trend 3: rising numbers of the oldest old. https://www.nia.nih.
gov/publication/why-population-aging-matters-global- perspective/trend-
3-rising-numbers-oldest-old. Accessed January 10, 2016.
5. Ibid.
6. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population
Division (2015). World Population Ageing 2015 (ST/ESA/SER.A/390).
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction
in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original
author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and
indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the
chapter’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds
the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copy-
right holder.
Demographics
7© The Author(s) 2019
J. Galiana, W. A. Haseltine, Aging Well,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2164-1_2
2
Healthcare in the United States
United States Health Spending and Outcomes
The health spending of the United States is the highest among the OECD
countries. It was 2.5 times greater than the OECD average in 2013.1
Health spending accounted for 16.4 percent of the gross domestic prod-
uct in 20132 and, in 2020, it is projected to represent 20 percent.3 By
2040 it is estimated that one third of all spending in the United States
will be on healthcare.4,5 Despite all of the spending, the health of
Americans lags behind. This is, in large part, a result of America divesting
from prevention and health promotion programs. Another contributing
factor to such poor health outcomes is that the United States does not
invest enough in building robust systems of primary care.6 Although the
United States spends close to the same amount as other Western coun-
tries on healthcare and social supports combined, the United States
spends proportionately less on social services and more on healthcare to
treat people after they become ill7 from what are often preventable dis-
eases. Adults in the United States are more likely than adults in other
developed nations to forgo necessary healthcare because they cannot
afford the cost.8 From 2010 to 2012, 54 percent of people with chronic
8
illness reported that cost was a barrier for them to access care. The patients
surveyed reported that they skipped medications, treatments, and doctor
visits because they could not afford the cost.9 Life expectancy is shorter in
the United States than most OECD countries. As of 2013 life expectancy
in the United States was 78.8, while the OECD average was 80.5.10 In
2014 the Commonwealth Fund ranked the United States healthcare last
among 11 countries.11,12 The measures included access, equity, quality,
efficiency, and healthy lives. Because of these findings, the government
and many health systems in the United States are creating new care mod-
els to address the issues of healthcare access, quality (including patient
satisfaction), and cost. Many of these innovations are designed to serve
older adults because the older cohort interacts with the healthcare system
more than others.
Our ultimate goal, after all, is not a good death, but a good life to the very
end. (Atul Gawande, Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End)
Optimal Aging
In the United States and internationally, there is a continuing focus on
community supports and inclusive societies that allow older adults to
remain active and engaged. This focus includes age-friendly cities, inclu-
sive housing, and employment opportunities. Most of the improvement
in healthcare and inclusive environments will positively affect those with
dementia, but providers and city planners are also committed to imple-
menting dementia-specific care and support measures.
Geriatric Workforce Shortage
Geriatricians are a critical factor of high-quality care for older adults. The
United States is already struggling with the ability to care for the older
population with the high rates of dementia and other chronic illnesses
and is lacking in a workforce that with appropriate training.13 According
to the American Geriatrics Society, as of 2015, the United States was
J. Galiana and W. A. Haseltine
9
short of 9500 geriatricians.14 This shortage threatens to grow as the popu-
lation ages. The World Health Organization cites that to meet the need
of the growing older population, all healthcare providers must be educated
in gerontology and geriatrics.15 Some suggest that having more geriatri-
cians in the hospital setting could reduce costs.16 This is important
because 25 percent of Medicare spending is attributable to inpatient hos-
pital care.17 Geriatricians are trained to understand and diagnose cogni-
tive problems and functional challenges with activities of daily living.
They also are knowledgeable about how drugs act differently in the aging
body and are adept at polypharmacy management. Additionally, geriatri-
cians are trained to manage multiple comorbidities and understand that
health management is often the primary focus rather than cure.
Prevalence of Chronic Disease
Longevity and lifestyle choices such as smoking, alcohol, and obesity
have contributed to people developing more chronic illnesses. The occur-
rence of multiple chronic conditions increases with age,18 which com-
pounds the burden of caring for the growing aging population. Almost
one half of older adults in America are living with both chronic condi-
tions and functional limitations.19 Eighty percent have at least one
chronic condition, and 50 percent have at least two.20 Approximately 75
percent of Americans 65 and older are living with multiple chronic
conditions21 and 20 percent are living with five or more chronic condi-
tions.22 The oldest old population (80 and older) is growing most rap-
idly23,24 and has the highest rates of comorbidity.
The number of people living with dementia is projected to increase by
more than 200 percent, from 44 million in 2014 to 135 million by 2050.25
One in nine people 65 and older have dementia. The statistics, however,
do not accurately represent the prevalence of dementia because an esti-
mated 50 to 90 percent of dementia cases go undiagnosed.26,27 The global
average rate of undiagnosed cases of dementia is 75 percent.28 The rates of
undiagnosed dementia vary from country to country. The highest rates are
found in the low- and middle-income countries.29 It is nearly impossible
to separate elder care from dementia care after the age of 75 because that
Healthcare in the United States
10
population represents 81 percent of the cases of dementia.30 As we men-
tioned, the oldest old is the population that is growing the fastest. Thirty-
two percent of that cohort have received a diagnosis of dementia.31
It is more expensive to meet the complex care needs of people with
multiple chronic conditions. Many will also need supportive help because
those with multiple chronic conditions experience higher levels of poor
functional status.32,33 Older adults who are living with five or more
chronic illnesses have, on average, 50 prescriptions and 14 different phy-
sicians and make 37 office visits annually.34 Those with multiple chronic
conditions account for 71 percent of the total healthcare spending in the
United States.35 The fee for service individuals with multiple chronic con-
ditions, who are beneficiaries of the government-sponsored Medicare,
accounts for 93 percent of the total Medicare spending.36 The unsustain-
ability of medical costs is an incentive for the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid to support more efficient, less costly, and better quality systems
of care for the sickest people. The financial burden is also borne by people
living with multiple chronic conditions through out of pocket costs and
the high price of prescription medications.
Meeting the healthcare and social needs of the older population is a world-
wide public health challenge. To properly and sustainably meet the needs of
older adults, providers must challenge fragmented and complex care and
social support systems and implement coordinated, person- centered care
across a variety of care settings and providers. Providers must also foster
chronic disease self-management programs and other forms of patient
engagement. Two important concepts that we address throughout the book
that serve to promote higher-quality accessible care with greater patient satis-
faction at a lower cost are person-centered and value-based care.
Person-Centered Care
One theme that occurs …