Description
COVID-19 has impacted the lives of everyone around the globe.
This pandemic has made us change the way we operate and behave. The pandemic has also changed the way organizations conduct business and move forward. As we have explored, some organizations have created strategies to work around the pandemic in an effective way while other organizations have not been as effective and have had to close their doors.
Dr. Khalid Jindan (2021) mentioned in his article that ?the challenge of the coronavirus disease may have caused a degree of adjustment, but it could in no way affect Saudi Arabia’s determination to go forward? para. 5).
Thinking about this:
- Select a KSA leader who has helped to keep Vision 2030 moving forward amid the challenges of COVID-19.
- Discuss three leadership characteristics that this leader possesses and provide examples of how they have demonstrated these characteristics.
- Explain how these three leadership characteristics have helped the leader keep Vision 2030 successful.
Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (including supporting citations) along with at least two current, scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. You may find that your discussion of leadership characteristics is easily supported with such current scholarly research, while the information about how your chosen leader exhibits those leadership characteristics is supported by popular research.
Keep in mind that current scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search. Current research means published in the last five years.
You are required to reply to at least two peer discussion question post answers to this weekly discussion question and/or your instructor?s response to your posting. These post replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to the content of the post and evaluate/analyze that post’s answer. Normal course dialogue does not fulfill these two peer replies but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required.
References:
Jindan, K. (2021).
Saudi vision 2030: Enlightened leadership, steady transformation.
Arab News.
https://www.arabnews.com/node/1851251
12:14 PM Mon 31 Jan
Il 70%
Discussion Rubric
Writing
Quality
O Points
No Evidence – Did
not participate.
–
2 Points
Meets Expectation
– Writing is well
organized, clear,
concise, and
focused; no errors.
.5 Points
Limited Evidence –
Numerous errors
or omissions-at
least some major-
in writing
organization,
focus, and clarity.
discussion.
1.5 Points
1 Point
Approaches
Below Expectation
Expectation – Some – Numerous
significant but not significant errors
major errors or or omissions in
omissions in
writing
writing
organization,
organization, focus, and clarity.
focus, and clarity.
1.5 Points
1 Point
Approaches
Below Expectation
Expectation – Initial – Initial post 2 days
post made 1 day late.
late.
1.5 Points
1 Point
Approaches Below Expectation
Expectation – Initial – Initial post only.
post and one other
post of substance.
2 Points
Timeliness Meets Expectation
– Initial post made
before deadline.
–
.5 Points
Limited Evidence –
Initial post 3 days
late.
0 Points
No Evidence – Did
not participate.
Quantity
2 Points
Meets Expectation
– Initial post and
two other posts of
substance.
.5 Points
Limited Evidence –
One post of
substance to
colleagues.
O Points
No Evidence – Did
not participate.
Points Possible: 10
12:14 PM Mon 31 Jan
Il 70%
?
Discussion Rubric
1 of 1
SEU Discussion Board Rubric
Meets
Expectation
Limited
Evidence
No
Evidence
Content
Approaches
Below
Expectation
Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
1.5 Points
1 Point
Approaches
Below Expectation
Expectation – – Demonstrates
Demonstrates fair significantly flawed
knowledge of knowledge of
concepts, skills, concepts, skills,
and theories.
and theories.
0 Points
No Evidence – Did
not participate.
.5 Points
Limited Evidence –
Demonstrates poor
or absent
knowledge of
concepts, skills,
and theories.
2 Points
Meets Expectation
– Demonstrates
excellent
knowledge of
concepts, skills,
and theories
relevant to topic.
2 Points
Meets Expectation
– Statements are
well supported;
posts extend
discussion.
Support
1 Point
Below Expectation
– Support is
deficient; posts do
not extend
discussion.
–
.5 Points
Limited Evidence –
Statements are not
supported
O Points
No Evidence – Did
not participate.
1.5 Points
Approaches
Expectation –
Statements are
partially
supported; posts
may extend
discussion.
1.5 Points
Approaches
Expectation – Some
significant but not
–
Writing
Quality
–
2 Points
Meets Expectation
– Writing is well
organized, clear,
1 Point
Below Expectation
– Numerous
significant errors
.5 Points
Limited Evidence –
Numerous errors
or omissions-at
O Points
No Evidence – Did
not participate.
–
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
