Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Business and Technical College Psychology Paper - Credence Writers
+1(978)310-4246 [email protected]

Description

Chapter 6 Reflection Paper (1-2 paragraphs)

In this chapter, you learned about Albert Bandura?s Social Learning Theory. Consider the many different behaviors that you engage in on a daily basis and identify one or two that you think you learned through modeling. In one to two paragraphs discuss these behaviors (only discuss positive behaviors!) and how they came to be modeled.

Learning
? Chapter 6
? PSY101
? Professor Heather Hoyt
This chapter covers the major theories of learning:
? Classical Conditioning
? Operant Conditioning
? Social Learning Theory
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC
Classical Conditioning (CC)
? This approach was developed by Ivan
Pavlov. Pavlov was not originally a
psychologist?he was a physiologist who
studied how dogs digested their food.
Whoa!
? In the course of this research, he noticed
that his dogs would salivate when he
entered the lab even though he had no
food. He assumed that they had
?associated? him with food and that the
salivation was occurring to prepare for
eating. Pavlov was intrigued by this and
couldn?t leave it alone. He shifted his
research to investigating this
phenomenon.
Pavlov?s Dog
? Pavlov assumed that if the animals had associated
him with the sight of food he could condition them to
salivate to any stimulus, as long as it had first been
paired with food.
? Now, everything in the CC process has a label. Pay
close attention!
FOOD ———————> SALIVATION
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY
Unconditioned
Unconditioned
Stimulus
Response
(UCS)
(UCR)
Food naturally elicits the salivation response. Elicit
means involuntary. You do not teach or condition an
animal to salivate to food. It happens naturally?it is
an inborn natural reflex. It is unconditioned.
? CC takes advantage of this natural process by pairing a
Neutral Stimulus (NS) a bell, with the UCS (food). Each pairing is
called a trial. So, look at the labels below:
? Bell
? Neutral Stimulus
? (NS)
Pavlov?s Dog
(cont.)
? The bell has no influence on the animal.
CC involves pairing the NS (Bell) with the UCS (Food)
NS————-UCS————->UCR
(BELL)
(FOOD)
(SALIVATION)
(Each paring of the bell and the food is called a trial)
? After several trials one tests to see if conditioning occurred.
So, the bell is presented alone, and hooray it causes salivation!
BELL—————–>SALIVATION
(CS)
(CR)
Note: The bell is now called a Conditioned Stimulus. The
salivation is now called a Conditioned Response.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY
Pavlov also studied some other important
phenomena. They are discussed below:
? Stimulus Generalization – This occurs when the
response spreads to other similar stimuli. So. for
instance, Pavlov?s dog once conditioned, may salivate
to other similar bell tones. Consider a real-life human
example: A child is stung by a bee. Afterwards, he may
not only fear bees but all flying insects.
? Stimulus Discrimination – This occurs when the
animal salivated to only one particular bell tone and
no other. Consider a real-life human example: A man is
bitten by a Golden Retriever. He now fears Golden
Retrievers but no other breed.
? Extinction – Pavlov wanted to find out what would
happen if he kept presenting the bell (CS) without
presenting the food (UCS). Over time the salivation
response decreased until it stopped. Essentially, it was
?turned off? as the animal?s nervous system learned
that the bell no longer signaled food. It would be a
waste of vital energy to produce saliva for no good
reason. So, it stops!
? Spontaneous Recovery – After extinction had
occurred Pavlov decided to see what might happen if
he rang the bell again. Low and behold the salivation
returned. It is if the animal never forgot it?the
response was always there?it had been learned!
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Behaviorism
Now, John B. Watson, while developing
Behaviorism, had read Pavlov?s work and was
quite impressed. Remember from Chapter 1 that
Watson stated that the focus of psychology
should be on observable behavior and that
everything about the human being had been
learned.
He decided to use CC principles to condition a
young infant (?Little Albert?) to fear a white lab rat.
Initially, Little Albert had no fear of the rat. It was
Watson?s goal to create an environmental event
that would lead to the development of fear of the
rat. So, each time the rat came near, Watson
would bang a loud noise behind Albert?s head.
This created a natural fear response (Albert would
be startled and cry). After a few pairings (trials) of
the rat and the loud noise Watson tested to see if
the rat alone would produce fear in Albert and, of
course, it did. Watson had the environmental
evidence he was looking for to support his theory
of Behaviorism.
Classical Conditioning Defined
So, here is a breakdown of the CC
terminology. Initially the rat is a neutral
stimulus (NS)?it has no effect on
Albert. The loud noise, however,
naturally causes fear in Albert. It is an
unconditioned stimulus (UCS). The fear
is an unconditioned response (UCR).
Each pairing of the rat and the loud
noise is a trial. After a few trials Watson
tested to see if conditioning occurred. It
did! Now, the rat is a conditioned
stimulus (CS) and the fear is a
conditioned response (CR).
One more thing?stimulus
generalization was noted in this
study. Albert became afraid of some
other white furry things (e.g., Santa
Claus mask, rabbit).
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC
A precursor to the development of Operant
Conditioning (see below) can be seen in the
work of E.L. Thorndike and his work with cats.
This gentleman would place hungry cats in
?puzzle boxes? outside of which was a plate of
food. The job of the cat was to figure out how to
escape via a latch system whereby upon escape
he would be allowed to eat a bite of food. The
food served as a reward for the escape behavior.
As soon as the animal had its reward Thorndike
would place it back in the box, start a
stopwatch, and time how long the animal took
to escape the 2nd time, 3rd time, etc.
Thorndike noted that the escape time
decreased on each successive trial indicating
that learning was taking place.
Based on this research Thorndike developed the
?Law of Effect? which essentially states that
behaviors which are followed by positive
consequences tend to be repeated.
Pre-Operant Conditioning
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC
Operant Conditioning?B.F. Skinner
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
Skinner coined the term ?operant.? It
means to ?operate on one?s environment?,
or quite simply, to ?behave.? In this form of
conditioning behaviors are emitted or
voluntary. Behaviors are then followed by
either a reinforcement (reward) or a
punishment.
Skinner conducted his research on rats and
pigeons in the famous ?Skinner Box? and
stated that the results gathered in his
laboratory investigations applied to human
beings. Yes, he believed that humans, rats,
and pigeons, all learned in the same
manner. So, in this theory behaviors are
shaped/controlled via reward and
punishment
Reinforcement and Punishment
Here is a breakdown on the types of
reinforcement and punishment that he
investigated.
? REINFORCEMENT–Reinforcement increases
the chances that a behavior will be repeated
? PUNISHMENT–Punishment decreases the
chances that a behavior will be repeated
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC
There are two types of each:
Positive Reinforcement/Negative Reinforcement
Positive Punishment/Negative Punishment
REINFORCEMENT
Positive (+) Something pleasant is added to one?s life
that increases the chances the behavior will be
repeated (e.g., money for a day?s work).
Negative (-) Occurs when we engage in a behavior
which removes (subtracts, takes away) something
unpleasant from our life (e.g., taking 2 aspirin to get
rid of a headache?if it works, we repeat the
behavior in the future). So, the behavior (operant) is
aspirin taking. It removes the unpleasantness of the
headache. Getting rid of the pain reinforces aspirin
taking behavior?you will do it again the next time
you have a headache! Wow!
Many students see the word ?negative? here and
think it?s punishment. It is not! Remember, it?s a form
of reinforcement so the likelihood of a behavior
being repeated is increased.
PUNISHMENT
Positive (+) Occurs when something unpleasant is
added to our life (e.g., getting screamed at for
misbehavior).
Negative (-) Occurs when something pleasant is
removed from our life (e.g., taking away a kids Iphone for being disrespectful).
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Partial and Continuous Reinforcement
Partial reinforcement occurs when a
behavior is reinforced every once in while,
not after each behavior that has been
emitted. Think about scrape off lottery
tickets. You don?t win each time?that
would be continuous reinforcement and it
would bankrupt the lottery! So, they let
you win every once in a while, by giving you
a little back. This keeps you playing!
? Partial reinforcement takes 4 different
forms?they are all considered ?Schedules
of Reinforcement? and discussed on the
next slide.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Schedules of Reinforcement-Skinner placed his animals on different schedules of
reinforcement to see their effects on behavior (e.g., bar pressing in the Skinner Box).
Ratio Schedules-In a ratio schedule the animal
only receives the reward after a certain number
of bar presses. There are 2 types:
Interval Schedules?These are based on
responding (bar pressing) at the right time in
order to get the reward. Again, there are 2
types:
a) Fixed Ratio?The animal must press the bar a
specific number of times before a reward is
delivered. So, you could place the rat on a FR20
schedule in which, over time, the animal would
learn to press the bar 20 times in a row to get
the reward.
b) Variable Ratio-In this schedule the number of
bar presses is not fixed?it usually averages out
to a certain number?however the animal does
not know how many presses will produce the
reward.
a) Fixed Interval?In this schedule the animal
will learn to press the bar after a specific
amount of time has passed. So, if we had a FI 30
second schedule the animal would learn to start
pressing the bar at around 28 -30 seconds. Only
after the 30 second mark does the reward
become available.
b) Variable Interval-In this schedule the time
varies as to when the reward becomes
available. So, the animal keeps ?checking? (bar
pressing) to see if they will indeed receive the
reward.
? Now, your text presents the schedules
with human, not animal, examples. Make
sure to read these and pay attention to
which one?s result in the highest amount of
responding.
? It is important to note that Skinner did
not believe in free will. We behave to
either obtain rewards or to avoid
punishments. Thus, thoughts (cognitions)
were not important to him.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
Latent
Learning
Read/Study in text..
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY
Social Learning Theory
Proposed by Albert Bandura, in this model we
learn by observing others behavior. It is
sometimes referred to as observational
learning or modeling theory.
In this model Cognition is important!!! This
means that we ?think? before we model?we
decide if we will model a behavior or not.
Here is the general rule:
We are more likely to model a behavior when
the model has been reinforced for that
behavior; we are less likely to model a
behavior when the model has been punished
for that behavior.
Bandura demonstrated his theory in the
classic ?Bo-Bo? doll study in which children
modeled an adult?s aggressive actions
towards an inflatable doll.
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Lecture Notes: Learning
This chapter covers the major theories of learning (Classical Conditioning, Operant Conditioning, and Social Learning
Theory).
Classical Conditioning (CC)?This approach was developed by Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov was not originally a psychologist?he
was a physiologist who studied how dogs digested their food. Whoa! In the course of this research he noticed that his
dogs would salivate when he entered the lab even though he had no food. He assumed that they had ?associated? him
with food and that the salivation was occurring to prepare for eating. Pavlov was intrigued by this and couldn?t leave it
alone. He shifted his research to investigating this phenomenon.
Pavlov assumed that if the animals had associated him with the sight of food he could condition them to salivate to any
stimulus, as long as it had first been paired with food.
Now, everything in the CC process has a label. Pay close attention!
FOOD ———————> SALIVATION
Unconditioned
Unconditioned
Stimulus
Response
(UCS)
(UCR)
Food naturally elicits the salivation response. Elicit means involuntary. You do not teach or condition an animal to salivate
to food. It happens naturally?it is an inborn natural reflex. It is unconditioned. CC takes advantage of this natural process
by pairing a Neutral Stimulus (NS) a bell, with the UCS (food). Each pairing is called a trial. So, look at the labels below:
BELL
Neutral Stimulus
(NS)
The bell has no influence on the animal.
CC involves pairing the NS (Bell) with the UCS (Food)
NS————-UCS————->UCR
(BELL)
(FOOD)
(SALIVATION)
(Each paring of the bell and the food is called a trial)
After several trials one tests to see if conditioning occurred. So, the bell is presented alone, and hooray it causes
salivation!
BELL—————–>SALIVATION
(CS)
(CR)
Note: The bell is now called a Conditioned Stimulus. The salivation is now called a Conditioned Response.
Pavlov also studied some other important phenomena. They are discussed below:
a) Stimulus Generalization-This occurs when the response spreads to other similar stimuli. So. for instance, Pavlov?s dog
once conditioned, may salivate to other similar bell tones. Consider a real life human example: A child is stung by a bee.
Afterwards, he may not only fear bees but all flying insects.
b) Stimulus Discrimination-This occurs when the animal salivated to only one particular bell tone and no other. Consider a
real life human example: A man is bitten by a Golden Retriever. He now fears Golden Retrievers but no other breed.
c) Extinction-Pavlov wanted to find out what would happen if he kept presenting the bell (CS) without presenting the food
(UCS). Over time the salivation response decreased until it stopped. Essentially, it was ?turned off? as the animal?s
nervous system learned that the bell no longer signaled food. It would be a waste of vital energy to produce saliva for no
good reason. So, it stops!
d) Spontaneous Recovery-After extinction had occurred Pavlov decided to see what might happen if he rang the bell
again. Low and behold the salivation returned. It is if the animal never forgot it?the response was always there?it had
been learned!
Now, John B. Watson, while developing Behaviorism, had read Pavlov?s work and was quite impressed. Remember from
Chapter 1 that Watson stated that the focus of psychology should be on observable behavior and that everything about
the human being had been learned. He decided to use CC principles to condition a young infant (?Little Albert?) to fear a
white lab rat. Initially, Little Albert had no fear of the rat. It was Watson?s goal to create an environmental event that would
lead to the development of fear of the rat. So, each time the rat came near, Watson would bang a loud noise behind
Albert?s head. This created a natural fear response (Albert would be startled and cry). After a few pairings (trials) of the rat
and the loud noise Watson tested to see if the rat alone would produce fear in Albert. And, of course it did. Watson had
the environmental evidence he was looking for to support his theory of Behaviorism.
So, hear is a breakdown of the CC terminology. Initially the rat is a neutral stimulus (NS)?it has no effect on Albert. The
loud noise, however, naturally causes fear in Albert. It is an unconditioned stimulus (UCS). The fear is an unconditioned
response (UCR). Each pairing of the rat and the loud noise is a trial. After a few trials Watson tested to see if conditioning
occurred. It did! Now, the rat is a conditioned stimulus (CS) and the fear is a conditioned response (CR)
One more thing?stimulus generalization was noted in this study. Albert became afraid of some other white furry things
(e.g., Santa Claus mask, rabbit).
A precursor to the development of Operant Conditioning (see below) can be seen in the work of E.L. Thorndike and his
work with cats. This gentleman would place hungry cats in ?puzzle boxes? outside of which was a plate of food. The job of
the cat was to figure out how to escape via a latch system whereby upon escape he would be allowed to eat a bite of
food. The food served as a reward for the escape behavior. As soon as the animal had its reward Thorndike would place it
back in the box, start a stopwatch, and time how long the animal took to escape the 2 nd time, 3rd time, etc. Thorndike
noted that the escape time decreased on each successive trial indicating that learning was taking place. Based on this
research Thorndike developed the ?Law of Effect? which essentially states that behaviors which are followed by positive
consequences tend to be repeated.
Operant Conditioning?B.F. Skinner
Skinner coined the term ?operant.? It means to ?operate on one?s environment?, or quite simply, to ?behave.? In this form of
conditioning behaviors are emitted or voluntary. Behaviors are then followed by either a reinforcement (reward) or a
punishment. Skinner conducted his research on rats and pigeons in the famous ?Skinner Box? and stated that the results
gathered in his laboratory investigations applied to human beings. Yes, he believed that humans, rats, and pigeons, all
learned in the same manner. So, in this theory behaviors are shaped/controlled via reward and punishment
Here is a breakdown on the types of reinforcement and punishment that he investigated.
REINFORCEMENT–Reinforcement increases the chances that a
behavior will be repeated
PUNISHMENT–Punishment decreases the chances that a
behavior will be repeated
There are two types of each: Positive Reinforcement/Negative Reinforcement
Positive Punishment/Negative Punishment
REINFORCEMENT
Positive (+) Something pleasant is added to one?s life that increases the chances the behavior will be repeated (e.g.,
money for a day?s work).
Negative (-) Occurs when we engage in a behavior which removes (subtracts, takes away) something unpleasant from
our life (e.g., taking 2 aspirin to get rid of a headache?if it works we repeat the behavior in the future). So, the behavior
(operant) is aspirin taking. It removes the unpleasantness of the headache. Getting rid of the pain reinforces aspirin taking
behavior?you will do it again the next time you have a headache! Wow!
Many students see the word ?negative? here and think it?s punishment. It is not! Remember, it?s a form of reinforcement so
the likelihood of a behavior being repeated is increased.
PUNISHMENT
Positive (+) Occurs when something unpleasant is added to our life (e.g., getting screamed at for misbehavior).
Negative (-) Occurs when something pleasant is removed from our life (e.g., taking away a kids I-phone for being
disrespectful).
Two additional terms: Partial and continuous reinforcement. Partial reinforcement occurs when a behavior is reinforced
every once in while, not after each behavior that has been emitted. Think about scrape off lottery tickets. You don?t win
each time?that would be continuous reinforcement and it would bankrupt the lottery! So, they let you win every once in a
while by giving you a little back. This keeps you playing!
Partial reinforcement takes 4 different forms?they are all considered ?Schedules of Reinforcement? and discussed below.
Schedules of Reinforcement-Skinner placed his animals on different schedules of reinforcement to see their effects on
behavior (e.g., bar pressing in the Skinner Box).
There are both Ratio Schedules and Interval Schedules.
Ratio Schedules-In a ratio schedule the animal only receives the reward after a certain number of bar presses. There are
2 types:
a) Fixed Ratio?The animal must press the bar a specific number of times before a reward is delivered. So, you could
place the rat on a FR20 schedule in which, over time, the animal would learn to press the bar 20 times in a row to get the
reward.
b) Variable Ratio-In this schedule the number of bar presses is not fixed?it usually averages out to a certain number?
however the animal does not know how many presses will produce the reward.
Interval Schedules?These are based on responding (bar pressing) at the right time in order to get the reward. Again,
there are 2 types.
a) Fixed Interval?In this schedule the animal will learn to press the bar after a specific amount of time has passed. So, if
we had a FI 30 second schedule the animal would learn to start pressing the bar at around 28 -30 seconds. Only after the
30 second mark does the reward become available.
b) Variable Interval-In this schedule the time varies as to when the reward becomes available. So, the animal keeps
?checking? (bar pressing) to see if they will indeed receive the reward.
Now, your text presents the schedules with human, not animal, examples. Make sure to read these and pay attention to
which one?s result in the highest amount of responding.
It is important to note that Skinner did not believe in free will. We behave to either obtain rewards or to avoid punishments.
Thus, thoughts (cognitions) were not important to him.
Latent Learning-Read/Study in text..
Ok?the last major theory is Social Learning Theory. It was Proposed by Albert Bandura. In this model we learn by
observing others behavior. It is sometimes referred to as observational learning or modeling theory. In this model
Cognition is important!!! This means that we ?think? before we model?we decide if we will model a behavior or not.
Here is the general rule:
We are more likely to model a behavior when the model has been reinforced for that behavior; we are less likely to model
a behavior when the model has been punished for that behavior.
Bandura demonstrated his theory in the classic ?Bo-Bo? doll study in which children modeled an adult?s aggressive actions
towards an inflatable doll.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

error: Content is protected !!