Chat with us, powered by LiveChat EXCELSIOR NUR533 2019 March Module 4 Discussion 1 Latest - Credence Writers
+1(978)310-4246 [email protected]

NUR533 ETHICS AND POPULATION HEALTH
M4D1: Population Based Health Disparities
No unread replies. No replies.
The purpose of this discussion is to provide you with an opportunity to receive feedback on the construction of your annotated bibliography and further develop your approach to this assignment. The focus of your annotated bibliography is on a specific population based health disparity that you have chosen to investigate. The annotated bibliography assignment asks you to conduct a literature search and identify 8 to 10 articles that address the disparity and write an annotation of each article.
For this discussion, choose one of the articles you identified for your annotated bibliography and include the following in your initial post:
Identify the disparity and the specific population.
Provide a brief synopsis of the article (in your own words, not a restatement of the abstract); include a link (URL) to the article.
Describe the usefulness of the article as a source of information about the disparity.
Does information provided in the article facilitate efforts to eliminate the health disparity? If it cannot be used to eliminate the health disparity, explain why
Describe ethical concerns you might have after reading this article.
Describe how information from the article enhanced your awareness of the disparity.
For your initial response, please be sure to address all of the above statements and/ or questions.
 
Use these EC Library and OWL resources for research assistance and to properly cite your work:
Master’s in Nursing Research Guide (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Plagiarism & Copyright (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Excelsior Library Writing Help (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
APA Citation Help (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Excelsior College Online Writing Lab (OWL) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
How You Are Evaluated
You are expected to participate in academic conversations with peers and faculty to generate scholarly dialogue. Expectations for participation in the course discussions are described under the Discussion Rubric: Exploration, Spirit of Inquiry, and Engagement (interactions) when relating your experiences, opinions, viewpoints, and ideas supported by evidence.
Consult the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. It is recommended that you write your post in a document first. Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to make your initial post, click “Reply.” Then copy/paste the text into the message field, and click “Post Reply.”
To respond to a peer, click “Reply” beneath her or his post and continue as with an initial post.
Evaluation
This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 40% of your final course grade.

error: Content is protected !!