Description
Part 1: ?Ethics
Directions: Read the case and the questions carefully before beginning your answer. ?Use original thought and support your ideas with citations from the text and other sources.
Case Description
You wake up in the emergency room and you have no idea how you got there. ?You are in a hospital gown, and you don?t know where your clothes are. ?You also hurt more than you ever have in your life. ?You are alone. ?Someone comes into your cubicle and asks you questions about your health insurance.
Part 1
Identify 2 ethics theories that were violated in this case. ?Discuss how your theories relate to the situation and include examples in your answer.
Part 2
You finally get in touch with your Mom and tell her where you are and what has happened. She is very angry about your treatment and contacts the director of the emergency room. ?If you are that director, outline steps that you would do to make sure this never happens again. ?Be sure to include ways to improve ethical treatment of patients like you.
Part 2: ?Policymaking
Directions: ?Read the summary entitled Healthcare Forecast 2022: 10 Trends for Board members and Senior Leaders.
Link:
Healthcare Trends for 2022_ Providers in for a rough year.pdf
Download Healthcare Trends for 2022_ Providers in for a rough year.pdf
Drawing from the 10 trends you have studied, put yourself in the shoes of the Chief Executive Officer of a hospital presenting the
one
(1) top concern for the year ahead you have selected for consideration by the Board of Directors of your organization.
Your task is to:
Prepare a concise summary of the one (1) trend/issue you have selected,
Explain why you see the selected issues as being especially important from a public policy perspective, and
Describe one hypothesis about how the trend/issue might practically impact your hospital in the year ahead. Impact areas you might address (one is fine) include patients, operations, staff, or finances.
To enhance your depth of understanding and analysis of your selected issue, research one additional relevant source about it and cite it in your response.
Sources and Evidence
20 to 15.0 pts
15 to >10.0 pts
Excellent
Good
Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality Demonstrates consistent use of credible
credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that relevant sources to support ideas that are
are appropriate for the discipline and genre of situated within the discipline and genre of
the writing
the writing.
10 to 5.0 pts
5 to 0 pts
5
Fair
Needs Improvement
Demonstrates an attempt to use credible Demonstrates an attempt
and/or relevant sources to support ideas that to use sources to support
are appropriate for the discipline and genre of ideas in the writing.
the writing
APA Format
15 to >10.0 pts
Good
10 to 5.0 pts
Fair
20 to > 15.0 pts
Excellent
APA format is used accurately and consistently in the paper and on
the “References page.
5 to >O pts
Needs Improvement
Format of the document is not
recognizable as APA.
APA is used with minor
errors.
There are frequent errors in
APA format.
Criteria
Ratings
Context of and Purpose for Writing
50 to 37.5 pts
37.5 to > 25.0 pts
Excellent
Good
Demonstrates a thorough understanding Demonstrates adequate consideration of
of context, audience, and purpose that is context, audience, and purpose and a clear
responsive to the assigned tasks) and focus on the assigned tasks) le-… the task
focuses all elements of the work.
. aligns with audience, purpose, and context).
)
25 to 12.5 pts
Fair
Demonstrates awareness of context,
audience purpose, and to the assigned
tasks(s) le.g., begins to show wareness of
audience’s perceptions and assumptions).
12.5 to 0 pts
Needs Improvement
Demonstrates minimal attention to
context, audience, purpose, and to
the assigned tasks(s) leg
expectation of instructor or self as
audience)
Content Development, including
substance/length
50 to 37.5 pts
Excellent
Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling
content to illustrate mastery of the subject,
conveying the writer’s understanding, and shaping
the whole work.
.
37.5 to >25.0 pts
Good
Uses appropriate, relevant and compelling
content to explore ideas within the context of
the discipline and shape the whole work
25 to > 12.5 pts
Fair
Uses appropriate and relevant
content to develop and explore
ideas through most of the work.
12.5 to 0 pts
Needs Improvement
Uses appropriate and relevant
content to develop simple ideas
in some parts of the work.
Control of Syntax and Mechanics
20 to > 15.0 pts
Excellent
Uses graceful language that skillfully
communicates meaning to readers with clarity
and fluency, and is virtually error-free.
15 to >10.0 pts
Good
Uses straightforward language that generally
conveys meaning to readers. The language in
the portfolio has few errors.
10 to 5.0 pts
Fair
Uses language that generally conveys
meaning to readers with clarity, although
writing may include some errors.
5 to 0 pts
Needs Improvement
Uses language that sometimes
impedes meaning because of
errors in usage.
Content logic
20 to >15.0 pts
>
Excellent
Ideas are arranged logically to support the
purpose or argument. They flow smoothly
from one to another and are clearly linked to
each other. The reader can follow the line of
reasoning.
15 to >10.0 pts
Good
Ideas are arranged logically to support the
central purpose or argument. They are
usually clearly linked to each other. For the
most part, the reader can follow the line of
reasoning.
10 to 5.0 pts
Fair
In general, the writing is arranged
logically, although occasionally ideas
fail to make sense together. The
reader is fairly clear about what the
writer intends.
5 to > pts
5 0
Needs Improvement
The writing is not logically organized.
Frequently, ideas fail to make sense
together. The reader cannot identify
a line of reasoning and loses interest.
Tone
20 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
The tone is consistently professional
and appropriate for an academic
research paper.
15 to >10.0 pts
>
Good
The tone is generally professional. For the
most part, it is appropriate for an academic
research paper.
10 to 5.0 pts
>
5 to 0 pts
Fair
Needs Improvement
The tone is not consistently professional The tone is unprofessional. It is not
or appropriate for an academic research appropriate for an academic research
paper
paper.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
