Evaluating Global Strategy Written Assignment
As a consultant for a multinational corporation, you have been tasked with evaluating the company's global strategy and recommending strategies to mitigate potential risks associated with global business operations. Your analysis should cover the following areas:
· Part 1: Evaluation of Global Strategies
Global Strategy: Evaluate the company's global strategy in relation to its operations in diverse international environments. Consider cultural, legal, and economic factors that may impact the company's success in different regions.
Competitive Environment: Identify the competitive environments in which the company operates in different regions. Analyze the company's strengths and weaknesses in relation to these environments.
Impact of Globalization: Evaluate the impact of globalization on the company's business operations and its impact on society.
· Part 2: Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategies
Risk Assessment: Identify potential risks associated with the company's global business operations, including cultural, legal, and economic risks. Analyze the potential impact of these risks on the company's business operations.
Mitigation Strategies: Recommend strategies to mitigate the potential risks associated with the company's global business operations. These strategies should be based on best practices in global strategic management and should take into account the technologies used in global strategic management.
Your analysis should be approximately 5 to 6 pages in length, double-spaced, and use APA formatting. You should include a minimum of 5 scholarly sources to support your analysis.
No plagiarism allowance, including AI, the similarity must be under 15%.
Rubric
|
Criteria |
Performance Indicators (Observation descriptors indicating extent to which criterion is met.) |
||||
|
Exemplary 10・9 |
Proficient 8・7・6 |
Needs Improvement 5・4 |
Unsatisfactory 3・2・1 |
No Submission |
|
|
Depth 30% of overall grade |
Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in depth analysis, and evidence of original thought and support for the topic. |
Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm evidence. |
Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas. |
Content indicates some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are unoriginal or underdeveloped. |
0 points |
|
Resources 25% of overall grade |
All evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses the required number and type of resources identified in the syllabus to support his/her argument. |
Most evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses 75% of the required number and type of resources identified in the syllabus to support his/her argument. |
Some evidence supports arguments and is relevant to the topic. The student uses 50% of the required number of sources. |
Limited evidence to support arguments, with few sources relevant to the topic. The student uses less than 50% of the required number of sources. |
0 points |
|
Organization 15% of overall grade |
Paper has a high degree of attention to logic and reasoning of points. Paper clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic. |
Paper is coherent and logically organized with transitions used between ideas and paragraphs to create coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present. |
Paper is somewhat structured and logically organized. Some points remain misplaced and stray from the topic. Transitions evident but not used throughout. |
Paper is limited in logical organization with major errors. |
0 points |
|
Mechanics 15% of overall grade |
Few errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure, and grammar. |
Occasional errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar, but meaning is not obscured. |
Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar; meaning confused or obscured. |
Dominated by errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar; meaning at times unidentifiable. |
0 points |
|
Formatting 15% of overall grade |
Paper meets all formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page-length and APA formatting requirements. Paper is correctly assembled with a professional look. |
The paper follows most formatting guidelines, including page-length and APA formatting requirements.Paper is correctly assembled. |
Paper generally follows formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page-length and APA formatting requirements. Paper has some assembly errors |
Paper does not follow formatting guidelines and assignment requirements, including page -length and APA format requirements. Paper has major assembly errors |
0 points |
